Volgens mij heeft het Reader Type cijfer een overzicht van de laatste 24 uur en het cijfer met de grafieken het aantal van de laatste volledige dag? Als je dus de tweede dag minder bezoekers hebt dan de eerste dag, dan zal het getal in het 24 uur overzicht gedurende de dag dalen.
Dat is de enige logische verklaring die ik kan geven.

Hi Hans. Yes, that’s an interface inconsistency that fixed last night. We were using the wrong number for “circulation”: we now show the same number as your FeedCount chicklet rather than the “Previous 24 Hour” number, which is what the “Readership” chart shows.

Let me start by admitting guilt and recognizing that this is way more confusing than it should be. The number represent different periods of time:
1. Daily circulation trend shows 109 for Sept 2. To tell you the truth, this row shouldn’t even be displayed. That’s a circulation number that is calculated based upon a partial day (since midnight in -0600 timezone). We’ll remove this row since it’s not an accurate circulation calculation.
2. Readership details. This number represents “the past 24 hours”, as of “right now”. So that represents the your circulation from (say) Sept 1 11:00am to Sept 2 11:00am.
3. The chicklet (and the myfeeds page) shows “yesterday’s” circulation (so, Sept 1 midnight to midnight).
Like I said, we’ll work on rationalizing this!
Eric Lunt
CTO, FeedBurner

@matt and eric: thanks for your conversation. Great! I thin it is the description which makes it confusing. In progress or/and real time is better. This number is then what is described: real time.
On eric: nr.1 I agree, need not been shown. So skip.
Should be great if a kind of realtime number is shown in the chicklet and stats.
Another thing is the different time zones. Now the number changes during our working day.
I think it is important to use the right words for the numbers.